Empty property premium proposed to help housing shortage

Owners of 1,888 empty properties in Birmingham will be urged to get them back into “much-needed” use.

208685_a6acba3e

Efforts to tackle Birmingham’s housing shortage are set to be boosted by a proposal due before the City Council Cabinet on 22nd January.

Following a change in the law in November 2018, the council intends to increase its premium on long-term empty properties, which will require an owner to pay double the regular Council Tax for it – rather than the current 150%.

Approximately 12,000 people are on the city’s housing register, an additional 2,600 households are in temporary accommodation (412 of which are in B&B accommodation) and 57 individuals have been identified as sleeping rough.

It is hoped the proposal going to Cabinet will act as an incentive to the owners of 1,888 properties in Birmingham that have been empty for a minimum of two-years to get them back into much-needed use.

It is estimated that if the proposal is approved, the city will receive an extra £1.15m per year in Council Tax revenue.

Speaking on the proposals, Cllr Ian Ward, Leader of Birmingham City Council, said: “When you consider the size of the homelessness issue that Birmingham faces, it is only right we look at every possible option to get empty homes occupied once again.

“The pressure this places upon us to look at costly alternatives such as bed and breakfast accommodation means those who own vacant properties should do their bit to help.

“This plan will go some way towards doing that.”

Cllr Sharon Thompson, Cabinet Member for Homes and Neighbourhoods, added: “Since 2009, we have built 3,000 homes as a council and have plans for 2,000 more – but there is still a long way to go if we are to meet our target of 51,100 by 2031.

“We are also looking at other innovations such as converting buildings into use for temporary accommodation and supporting initiatives such as Housing First, but we still need to look at how we get even more homes available for people in the city.

“If this plan saw all affected properties brought back into use, we’d be able to reduce our housing register number by 15% – or if you looked at it another way, cut our temporary accommodation number by approximately 70%.”

Comments